, prepend=, prepend=
May
17

Beyonce Pregnant Again? Sources Confirm ‘Epic’ Star Is Carrying Baby No. 2


Turns out those Beyonce pregnancy reports are more than just speculation.

Multiple sources have confirmed to E! News that the “Epic” star and her rapper husband, Jay-Z, are expecting baby number two. While the couple have yet to comment or confirm, fellow hip-hop mogul Russell Simmons tweeted his congratulations to the couple. Hmm, interesting. Very interesting.

Speculation about whether Blue Ivy’s mom was again with child began after photos of Bey looking a little bit bigger in the tummy region while on tour popped up on the Internet. The NY Post then reported that sources had confirmed to them that the singer was, in fact, pregnant.

As you may recall, Beyonce announced her first pregnancy without saying a word — she just showed up at the MTV Video Music Awards sporting an unmistakable baby bump and rubbed her belly. In other words, there’s no telling when or how Beyonce will announce baby number two.

We’ll be waiting!

[via E! News, NY Post]

May
17

‘Hangover 3′ Red Band Trailer: Take a Walk Down a NSFW Memory Lane (VIDEO)


Cue the Boyz II Men, ’cause our days with the Wolf Pack are almost over.

First, let’s remember the good times with Phil, Stu, Alan, Doug, and all the other miscreants they ran into. This video, narrated by Zach Galifianakis, is like a balm to soothe our wounds. Remember that time with the tiger? How about the smoking monkey? What about when Mr. Chow jumped out of the car trunk naked? Inappropriate baby jokes! Mike Tyson being himself!

Of course, “The Hangover Part III” ups the ante even more — angry chickens, an exotic animal (this time a giraffe), Tijuana, probably some dead bodies, and lots of jokes about wieners. What more could you ask for?

Put on your headphones if you’re at work — or turn the computer speakers down real low if your mom is home — and enjoy.

“Hangover 3″ hits theaters May 23.

May
17

Why ‘Man of Steel’ Didn’t Use ‘Superman’ in the Title


Even superheroes need a makeover sometimes. It’s happened before, with Batman and Iron Man and plenty of other comic book characters; even Superman isn’t immune. For the upcoming “Man of Steel,” director Zack Snyder and co-writers David S. Goyer and Christopher Nolan made sure to distance their movie from previous installments by not putting “Superman” in the title, and giving the movie some technological tweaks and a grittier vibe.

Goyer explained by in an Empire podcast a few weeks ago. “We always knew we would be using the Superman glyph or the shield as we call it. But ‘Man Of Steel’ was also supposed to represent our take, which was he’s a man, but he’s not made of flesh and blood, metaphorically he’s a man of steel. So that was sort of the whole thing wrapped up in a nutshell.”

It doesn’t hurt that a 2006 attempt to bring Supes back to the big screen, directed by Bryan Singer and starring Brandon Routh, didn’t exactly turn the world on its ear.

Even with a new name, it will be hard for fans to shake the mental image of a lantern-jawed Christopher Reeve as Superman. However, Henry Cavill could do a pretty darned good job of giving us a fresh look at an old friend. And a bad-ass General Zod will be pretty cool, too.

[via Empire]

May
17

Marvel Phase Three: ‘Doctor Strange,’ ‘Iron Man 4,’ ‘Hulk’ Movies May Be Coming


You didn’t think Marvel was going to let you off the hook that easily, did you? Nope, the comic book company is already planning Phase Three of its sprawling media empire. Sounds sinister, doesn’t it? It’s not! We promise.

Phase One began with “Iron Man” and culminated in “The Avengers.” Similarly, Phase Two just kicked off with the release of “Iron Man 3″ and will end after a total of five movies with 2015′s “The Avengers 2.” Even though Marvel is still knee-deep in Phase Two, studio prez Kevin Feige gave EW a very early preview of what’s coming down the pipeline.

Feige said, “I’d say 99 percent of our time right now is purely spent on Phase Two… It’s five colossally giant motion pictures that we have to produce. So that’s taking up the time. But within the next year or so we’ll start the advanced planning for post-’Avengers 2.’”

The Marvel honcho was fairly forthcoming for details on movies that are still in their nascent stages. We do know that Edgar Wright’s “Ant-Man” is a sure thing, and “Doctor Strange” is “one of the prime candidates.” We all know that “Iron Man 4″ would go over like gangbusters, but also that Robert Downey Jr. is still in talks over his part in the future of Tony Stark. “Black Panther” is still just a hope and a dream, though eagle-eyed writers have noted that Marvel might be filming some of “The Avengers 2″ in Cape Town, a hint that, followed to conclusion, leads some to believe that BP could be a new recruit. The rest of the Marvel cast of characters — Daredevil, Ghost Rider, zombies, and so on — are either very unlikely or still in the wishful thinking stages.

But what about The Hulk, you say? Feige told EW, “Mark [Ruffalo] could stand in his own movie. … We’re talking about it. We’re excited to sit down and go, ‘What is a stand-alone Hulk movie?’”

We’ve got a few years to find out.

[via EW]

EARLIER: Comic-Con 2012 Marvel Panel: ‘Iron Man 3′ Trailer, ‘Guardians Of The Galaxy’ Announced

May
17

Joss Whedon Confirms Tony Stark for ‘Avengers 2′; Teases Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch


“The Avengers 2″ isn’t due out until 2015, but we’re all eager beavers for as much info as possible. Luckily, writer/director Joss Whedon is happy to oblige.

Whedon was at the ABC Upfronts this week chatting up the new Marvel show “Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.,” when he revealed a few more details regarding the follow-up to 2012′s big-budget blockbuster. Earlier, Whedon had let slip some juicy tidbits about “a brother/sister act” that would appear in “The Avengers 2,” which fans speculated would be Scarlet Witch and her twin Quicksilver. In an interview with IGN, the director more or less confirmed that assumption.

“You know, they had a rough beginning. They’re interesting to me because they sort of represent the part of the world that wouldn’t necessarily agree with The Avengers. So they’re not there to make things easier. I’m not putting any characters in the movie that will make things easier.”

Another confirmation from Whedon? Tony Stark will (not surprisingly) be back for the sequel as well, even though he destroyed his suits at the end of “Iron Man 3.”

“Well, I feel like in ‘Iron Man 3,’ even though he said, ‘I’ve changed’ — he blew up his remote suits, but I don’t think anybody thinks he doesn’t have one anymore. The question is, if The Avengers are called, does he show up? And the answer is, ‘Yes!’”

How will Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver figure into all of this? Guess we’ll have to wait until the next time Whedon decides to let another tidbit slip. Perhaps on Twitter?

[via IGN]

May
17

Christopher Nolan for James Bond Movie? Director Allegedly Courted to Direct


If there’s one thing that is very, very, very clear, it’s that “Dark Knight” director Christopher Nolan loves James Bond.

Ever since he decided to do massive movies, he has included sequences that could have been lifted directly from one of the dashing adventures of Britain’s most suave superspy. Nolan knows how to mimic James Bond set pieces in tone and intensity. There’s the Hong Kong sequence from “The Dark Knight,” the whole third act of “Inception” (with the snow fort, which seems to have been a hodgepodge lift of various Bond tropes), and the opening sequence of “The Dark Knight Rises,” which had more jaw-dropping spectacle than all of “Quantum of Solace” combined.

Now, Nolan may get his chance to do a 007 entry himself.

According to the UK paper the Daily Mail (so please, find the biggest grain of salt you can and take it), “informal talks have begun” between Nolan and the Bond powers that be — namely producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael Wilson — for him to helm the next chapter in the franchise.

After the worldwide critical and commercial success of “Skyfall,” it was assumed Sam Mendes would be game to direct another Bond outing, but commitments to theatrical productions, as well as the exhausting amount of effort that it takes to get a Bond movie off the ground, sidelined those plans. It would be fascinating if the series entered an “auteur” phase, with big name directors, known for their singular artistic visions, took on a series known for its workmanlike dexterity more than its creative adventurousness.

Right now Nolan is in the middle of prepping “Interstellar,” his big-budget space exploration film that will star Jessica Chastain, Anne Hathaway, Matthew McConaughey, and (of course) Michael Caine. That film will be out on November 7th, 2014. It’s unclear whether Nolan would have the time (or the energy) to jump from one gigantic project to the next, but we’re crossing our fingers that this isn’t simply tabloid chatter.

[via Daily Mail]

May
17

Edward Furlong, ‘Terminator 2′ Star, Arrested Again


Edward Furlong, star of “Terminator 2″ and “American History X,” was arrested last night for violating a restraining order his ex-girlfriend filed against him, according to TMZ.

The troubled, 35-year-old actor has been arrested twice before, TMZ reports, for domestic violence charges involving the same woman. He was sentenced to six months in jail in March on the same charges, but didn’t serve the full term. This time, when police arrived at his ex’s home in West Hollywood, they found Furlong hiding under a stairwell close to her home.

Furlong was later taken into custody and charged with a felony. He’s now being held on $100,000 bail.

[via TMZ]

May
17

Cannes 2013: $1M in Jewelry Stolen at Film Festival


It’s like something out of a movie.

One-million dollars worth of Chopard jewelry was stolen last night at the Cannes Film Festival, according to Guardian UK.

The pricey bling was supposed to be worn by celebrities at the French film fest, but instead the jewels were taken from the hotel room of one of the Swiss luxury jeweler’s employees. The pieces were in a security box, which French police say was smashed and hauled out of the room.

Funnily enough, the jewelry, which was scheduled to be worn on the red carpet last night, was taken during the premiere of Sofia Coppola’s new film, “The Bling Ring,” which tells the story of teen thieves who stole from the rich and famous in Hollywood. Mere coincidence, or a copy-cat crime? We’re going with coincidence, unless Emma Watson is prepping for “Bling Ring 2: The Big Heist.”

No word yet on which celebrities were left jewel-less by the crime.

[via Guardian UK]

May
17

Noah Baumbach’s ‘Frances Ha,’ or How to Make a Movie in Secret


It’s almost impossible to compare a small, independent film with today’s no-holds-barred superhero blockbusters. However, if there’s one thing that Noah Baumbach’s “Frances Ha” manages to have in common with, say, “The Avengers,” is secrecy.

For the film — which was shot in secret during 2011 and 2012 — Baumbach decided to withhold parts of the script from the cast, providing them with only the scenes in which their characters appeared. This method appears to have paid off, as critics have been swooning over “Frances” since it premiered at Telluride Film Festival last fall.

Of course, the secrecy factor is where the blockbuster comparisons end for “Frances Ha.” The black-and-white movie follows Frances (Greta Gerwig), an aspiring 27-year-old dancer who is looking to come to grips with adulthood as she struggles to keep a job in New York City.

Here, Baumbach offers some tips on shooting a secret film, talks about why all of his movies have great soundtracks, and reveals how he ended up writing “Madagascar 3.”

Moviefone: You didn’t set out to shoot this in secret. But, either way, it seems like a tough thing to do.
Noah Baumbach: We gamed the Internet! It was deliberate to keep the low profile, but I didn’t think Oh, we won’t be reported [in the media] somewhere down the line. We just didn’t announce ourselves and then that was really it. But it’s like, we were [in New York City] doing it. If people had walked by us and recognized us, they would have discovered something.

Was shooting low-profile a good experience? It seems like it worked to your benefit.
I mean, we could have done the same work and everything we did, even if we had been [more official]. But I think there’s something kind of nice, particularly in 2011-12, to be the only ones who know about it. Writing is a private experience and filmmaking is sort of necessarily a communal group thing, but it’s kind of nice in a way for the crew to feel sort of focused and private about it; it was our thing and nobody else’s.

It seemed pretty secret within the production itself. You withheld some of the script from the actors.
Yeah, I didn’t show the script. No actor — except Greta [who co-wrote the film] — had the script beyond their scenes. And what we’d do, we would send them — and we shot chronologically, so we could do this — the pages for that week, maybe a few days in advance, but not past that. So not only did they just get their scenes, they got them as those shooting days approached. And I think it just kept people in the moment and not overly concerned with the movie as a whole. It’s my job to be concerned about that. And because the movie was in chapters, and some people are kind of in a chapter and then disappear for awhile and then come back in another chapter, it kind of made that easier, too.

Actors didn’t really need to know what they were doing in the meantime or anything like that. And, if they asked, I would just make something up for them [laughs].

It’s funny to hear that method being used for an indie film. Most of the time you hear about those techniques used on a giant superhero movie (withholding the entire script from actors, shooting in secret, etc.).
Yeah, who the villain is is not important here [laughs]. But, you know, I suppose in our own way, we’re looking for some of the privacy that [those films have].

A lot of people are going to have David Bowie’s “Modern Love” stuck in their heads after this movie.
That’s a good one to get stuck in your head.

Was that always the song you had in mind?
I thought about a few different things, but I think that song’s kind of perfect. It’s so joyful. I feel like everything about it sounds great — his vocal is so great, the way he kind of shout-sings it. It just feels so immediate. When I was a kid and I got the “Let’s Dance” record for the first time, it was the first song on it and I remember just hearing that song; I don’t think I’d heard a better song and I would just play it over and over again.

All of your movies have really great soundtracks: “Margot at the Wedding” had Steve Forbert, “Greenberg” had a James Murphy score. Even movies you wrote but didn’t direct, like “Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou,” have great music.
Yeah, although we wrote the David Bowie into the [“Life Aquatic”] script because it was always written that Seu Jeorge’s character, Pele, would play David Bowie. I mean, it’s always interesting. With “Greenberg” I was listening to LCD Soundsystem’s “The Sound of Silver” while I was working on it. I didn’t necessarily feel like that music was tonally right for “Greenberg,” but I felt like the guy who made this music should probably score “Greenberg.” So I met James Murphy, and we became friends and he wrote a score, which is awfully different from LCD Soundsystem. I thought they were beautiful. I really love what he did.

With “Frances,” I had this instinct that, when I was cutting it, it could really hold a big, bold score, and I started to put in all these old French New Wave scores. It felt like the movie was so strong and flexible that it could hold it, and I really pushed it. I felt like it really elevated and broadened the movie. You almost couldn’t get too big or too romantic.

Fans of your work were pretty surprised that you ended up writing “Madagascar 3,” since you had really only done smaller indies up to that point. How was that experience?
It was a great experience. I really enjoyed it. I learned a lot about the animation process, which was really interesting to me, because you work over such a long period of time. And I liked those guys so much and I think they’re so good at what they do. I have a movie that I am developing there that I would direct. But yeah, I loved it. It’s not altogether different from when I work with Wes [Anderson]. It’s like I felt my job there was to help make the movie as good as possible. And there’s something nice about that as an alternate to what I do with the movies I direct, which is so rigourous and I am involved with every part of it until the very end. It doesn’t stop until you let go of it, which I probably need to do.

Did they approach you?
They came to me, and I worked with Ben [Stiller] on “Greenberg,” so Ben, I think, liked the idea, and I really liked the other two movies and I like Chris Rock a lot, too. It seemed like fun. That said, when I started it, I didn’t know how long the process was — I had never done animation.

Earlier on Moviefone: Greta Gerwig, ‘Frances Ha’ Star, Isn’t Interested in ‘Being a Great Actor in a Sh– Movie’

May
17

‘Star Trek Into Darkness’: Should You See It? (VIDEO)


The follow up to J.J. Abram’s 2009 “Star Trek” reboot hit theaters yesterday (a day earlier than previously planned) and has been getting both good and not-so-good reviews. If you read what the critics have to say before seeing a movie, you may be confused as to whether “Star Trek Into Darkness” is really worth it.

Is it as good as its predecessor? Should it be seen in IMAX 3D? Do Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto continue to do Captain Kirk and Spock justice?

If those are the questions consuming your thoughts today, Moviefone has your answers.

Mr. Moviefone (aka Russ Leatherman) joined HuffPost Live host Jacob Soboroff to discuss the big sci-fi release. Watch the latest Moviefone Live above to hear what they had to say!